Rules are essential for creating alignment and achieving predictable outcomes. But how can we distinguish between good and bad rules? Most rules are introduced to address misalignments, frustrations, or to provide guidance and set expectations. However, poorly designed rules can lead to unintended consequences—frustration, mistrust, a lack of accountability, or reduced innovation.
Here’s the mental model I use to evaluate and craft effective rules:
- Minimize the Number of Rules
You can’t (and shouldn’t) try to control everything. No matter how many rules you create, edge cases will always exist. Instead, focus on what’s essential and leave room for flexibility. - Switch from Rules to Judgment
Provide context and help people understand what’s good for the company and their team. When people feel a sense of responsibility and have the right context, they’ll usually make the right call. - Avoid Collective Punishment
If a few individuals break trust, work with them directly. Don’t punish everyone by changing a good rule that works for the majority. - Autocorrect Quickly
Seek feedback from your team or observe outcomes. If a rule produces bad results, don’t wait—fix it fast to minimize side effects.
